ASAB
- ASAB
- 2011
- Heft 2 (Seite 279-541)
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- McGregor: L'arbitrage en droit public: un orphelin au sein de la LTF?
- Ouerfelli: Recent Developments of Arbitration Law and Practice in Tunisia
- Halonen: Bridging the Gap in the Notion of ‘Investment’ between ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitrations: Note on an Award Rendered under the Bilateral Investment Treaty between Switzerland and Uzbekistan (Romak SA v Uzbekistan)
- Scherer: Introduction to the Case Law Section, ASAB Volume 29, issue 2, 2011
- Commune de X à X v Y, S.A. à X, Siégeant à X, Partial Award, 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, I ère Cour civile, 4P.174/2005, 27 October 2005
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X SA v. A, Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_446/2009, 8 December 2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: SIX Swiss Exchange AG v. A, Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_533/2010, 1 December 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. AG, Y. SA v. A., I ère Cour de droit civil, 4A_438/2008, 17 November 2008
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Garage A. et fils v. Z. AG, Tribunal fédéral, I ère Cour civile, 4P.299/2006, 14 December 2006
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A., B. and others v. X. , Y., I ère Cour de droit civil, 4A_562/2009, 27 January 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A. v. X. AG, Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung,, 4A_538/2008, 2 February 2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. SA v. Y., Tribunal fédéral, I ère Cour de droit civil, 4A_586/2008, 12 June 2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A.X. v. B.Y., Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_162/2010, 22 June 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. SA v. Y. SpA, Tribunal fédéral, I ère Cour de droit civil, 4A_584/2009, 18 March 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. Federation v. A., Y., Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_566/2009, 22 March 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, I ère Cour de droit civil, 4A_80/2010, 26 April 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, I ère Cour de droit civil, 4A_642/2010, 15 February 2011
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X., Y. v. Z., Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_240/2009, 16 December 2009
- Kleinheisterkamp: Note - 16 December 2009, Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_240/2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. v. Y., Z., Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_510/2009, 14 June 2010
- Not Indicated v. Not Indicated, Kanton Zürich, Handelsgericht, Not Indicated, 22 October 2008
- Hollander/Draye: Belgium: Brussels Bar Lifts the Traditional Prohibition on Preparatory Contacts Between Attorneys and Witnesses in Arbitration
- [In modern day international arbitration practice, ...]
- Admissibility of Witness Evidence in Arbitration conducted in Belgium
- International Arbitration Practice of taking witness evidence requires an active role for Parties' Counsel
- Tensions between an attorney's active role and the deontological restrictions of his bar association
- An exemption for attorney - witness contacts in arbitration
- Conclusion
- von Rechenberg: Keine ethischen Richtlinien für Anwälte in Schiedsgerichtsverfahren
- Bibliography
- Heft 2 (Seite 279-541)
- 2011
Module suchen