ASAB
- ASAB
- 2010
- Heft 2 (Seite 205-455)
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Nelson: Annulment of International Arbitration Awards: The Orinoco Steamship Case Sails On
- Markus/Giroud: A Swiss Perspective on West Tankers and Its Aftermath: What about the Lugano Convention?
- Legler: Sind in Zukunft Patentstreitigkeiten in der Schweiz de lege lata nicht mehr schiedsfähig? Überlegungen im Hinblick auf das Inkrafttreten des neuen Bundesgesetzes über das Bundespatentgericht
- Scherer: Introduction to the Case Law Section, ASAB Volume 28, issue 2, 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_260/2009, 6 January 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_488/2009, 15 February 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_464/2009, 15 February 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_160/2009, 25 August 2009
- Burger: Note - 25 August 2009 - Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung - Le point sur la théorie des faits de double pertinence (« doppelrelevante Tatsachen ») en arbitrage international – commentaire de l'ATF 4A_160/2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Thales (anciennement Thomson CSF) v. Frontier AG Bern en liquidation et, Brunner Sociedade Civil de Administraçao Limitada, Tribunal fédéral, Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_596/2008, 6 October 200
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Imuna v. Octapharma AG, Bundesgericht, I. Zivilabteilung, 4P.243/2000, 8 January 2001
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Parties not indicated, Tribunal fédéral, Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_3/2009, 20 May 2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. AG v. Federation Y., Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_94/2009; 4A_96/2009, 9 June 2009
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A., Azerbaijan Wrestling Federation (AWF) v. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), International Federation of Associated Wrestling Styles (FILA), Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_416/
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A. v. Agencia X, Bundesgericht, I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, 4A_574/2009, 4 February 2010
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X., Craiova and others v. Y., Tribunal fédéral, Présidente de la Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_628/2009, 17 February 2010
- Koch: Judicial activism and the limits of institutional arbitration in multiparty disputes
- Wüstemann/Arroyo: ‘FIFA shall be the sole arbiter’ – a valid arbitration clause under Swiss law
- I Introduction
- II Origin and Background of the Dispute
- III Procedural History
- IV Summary of the Parties' Positions
- V The Zurich High Court, on a prima facie basis, confirmed that the clause in dispute constituted an arbitration agreement
- VI The Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Award
- VII Concluding Comments and Lessons to be drawn
- Adeline: L'édification de la notion d'estoppel par la Cour de cassation (France) – Société Merial c. Société Klocke Verpackungs – Service GMBH
- Graf/Appleton: ECJ Case C 40/08 Asturcom – EU Unfair Terms Law Confirmed as a Matter of Public Policy
- Swiss Chambers' Court of Arbitration and Mediation
- Reichert: New Irish Arbitration Act
- Bibliography
- Heft 2 (Seite 205-455)
- 2010
Module suchen