ASAB
- ASAB
- 2013
- Heft 2 (Seite 237-496)
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Schneider: President's Message: A Taxonomy of Arbitrators and the New Species of arbiter compositus
- Baizeau: The Bulletin in Brief
- Berger: Rights and Obligations of Arbitrators in the Deliberations
- Belohlavek: Importance of the Seat of Arbitration in International Arbitration: Delocalization and Denationalization of Arbitration as an Outdated Myth
- I. Definition of the “seat of arbitration”
- II. Meaning of the seat of arbitration
- III. Seat of arbitration; place of hearings, place where the arbitral award is made and signed; classification of an arbitral award
- IV. Determination (choice) of the seat of arbitration in international arbitration
- V. Seat of arbitration and annulment of the arbitral award by court
- VI. Subjective internationalization of a domestic dispute
- B. The seat of arbitration is abroad versus the place where the arbitral award is made is situated in another country
- D. Internationalization of a domestic dispute and enforcement of an arbitral award
- Covo: FOSFA and GAFTA Standard Form Contracts and their Arbitration Systems
- Leimbacher: Efficiency under the New ICC Rules of Arbitration of 2012: first glimpse at the new practice
- Scherer: Introduction to the Case Law Section
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. GmbH (précédemment V. GmbH) v. Y. Sàrl, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Decision 4A_14/2012, 2 May 2012
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. v. Z., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Decision 4A_414/2012, 11 December 20121An English translation will be published in Swiss Int'l Arb. L. Rep. and is also ava
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. Lda., handelnd durch Dr. M., Administradora de Insolvencia v. Y. Ltd., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Decision 4A_50/2012, 16 October 20121An English translation
- Naegeli: The Capacity of a Bankrupt Party to Be or Remain a Party to International Arbitral Proceedings: A Landmark Decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: Tribunal fédéral, Ière Cour de droit civil, 4A_146/2012, Arrêt du 10 janvier 2013, Etat d'Israël (l’État X., ci-après: le recourant) contre National Iranian Oil Company (« NIOC »,société Z., ci-
- Scherer/Baizeau: Swiss Federal Supreme Court confirms NIOC vs. Israel award – No review of French court decision to appoint arbitrator in order to avoid international denial of justice
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 2nd Civil Law Chamber: A. v. B., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 2nd Civil Law Chamber, Decision 5A_427/2011, 10 October 20111See also Blaise STUCKI, Louis BURRUS, Sentence arbitrale étrangère, séquestre et exeq
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 2nd Civil Law Chamber: A. v. 1. B., 2. C.,Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 2nd Civil Law Chamber, Decision 5A_355/2012, 21 December 20121See also Blaise STUCKI, Louis BURRUS, Sentence arbitrale étrangère, séquest
- Stucki/Burrus: Sentence arbitrale étrangère, séquestre et exequatur Note sur l'arrêt du Tribunal fédéral 5A_355/2012 du 21 décembre 2012*ASA Bull. 2/2013, p. 418ss.
- Court of Cassation of France, First Civil Law Chamber: TECSO v. S.A.S. NEOELECTRA Group, Court of Cassation of France, First Civil Law Chamber, Decision 11-2029910, 10 October 2012
- Court of Appeal of Paris: E.U.R.L. TECSO v. S.A.S. NEOELECTRA GROUP, Court of Appeal of Paris, Decision 09/28537, 09/28540, 10 March 2011
- Heintz/da Costa Cerquiera: Vers une rationalisation de l'obligation de révélation de l'arbitre en droit français
- Bibliography
- Heft 2 (Seite 237-496)
- 2013
Module suchen