ASAB
- ASAB
- 2014
- Heft 4 (Seite 683-948)
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Geisinger: President’s Message: Drafting an Award: For Whom? Why?
- Besson: Hommage au Professeur Jean-François Poudret
- Scherer: The Bulletin in Brief
- de Werra: The Expanding Significance of Arbitration for Patent Licensing Disputes: from Post-Termination Disputes to Pre-Licensing FRAND Disputes
- Haas: Zwangsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit im Sport und EMRK
- Lembo/Conrad Hari: International Arbitration in Switzerland and Foreign Bankruptcy: Where Do We Stand?
- Ponty: Key features of the LCIA Arbitration Rules
- Scherer: Introduction to the Case Law Section
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A. v. Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Deutschland, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_178/2014, 11 June 2014
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A. Kft. v. B. GmbH, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_597/2013, 19 June 2014
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. SA v. Z, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_509/2013, 27 January 2014
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. v. 1. A.Y. AG, 2. B.Y. Inc., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. BGE 140 III 134, 4A_438/2013, 27 February 2014
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: A. SA v. B. SA, Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_124/2014, 7 july 2014
- Scherer/Moss: Swiss and English courts analyse enforceability of multi-tier dispute resolution provision providing for DAB proceedings (FIDIC, clause 20)
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. S.A. v. 1. Y., 2. Fédération Z., au nom de qui agit son secrétaire général, A., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_564/2013, 7 April 2014
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. Corp. v. Y. Ltd., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_330/2013, 17 September 2013
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber: X. SA v. Z., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_537/2012, 8 January 2013
- A party’s failure to pay its share of the advance on costs: BDMS Limited v. Rafael Advanced Defence Systems
- Berard/Lewis: Privy Council confirms pro-enforcement approach under New York Convention
- Introduction
- The facts of the dispute
- The arbitration
- The recognition and enforcement proceedings in the BVI
- The Privy Council's decision on whether the tribunal had exceeded its jurisdiction
- The Privy Council's decision on whether Çukurova had been unable to present its case
- The Privy Council's decision on whether recognition and enforcement would be contrary to public policy
- Recognition and enforcement elsewhere
- Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Çukurova Holding A.S v. Sonera Holding B.V. (Extract of [2014] UKPC 15), Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Privy Council Appeal No. 0096 of 2013, 13 May 2014
- High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court: Peterborough City Council v. Enterprise Managed Services Ltd (Extract of [2014] EWHC 3193 (TCC)), High Court of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Divisio
- Bibliography
- Heft 4 (Seite 683-948)
- 2014
Module suchen